トレンドトピック
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
これにほとんど同意します。ただし、DA (読み取り帯域幅) に celestia を使用すると、TIA に賭ける必要はなくなりますが、時間の経過とともに大幅なコスト削減と相互運用性の利点が得られる可能性があることに注意してください
同様に、AWSやAzureを使用しても、AMZNやMSFTに賭ける必要はありません
現在の企業がスタンドアロン チェーンを推進しているのは、ロールアップが最終目標ではないことを示すものではなく、ロールアップの現在の基盤が十分ではないことを示しています
たとえば、イーサリアムの場合: DA は彼らの野心に対して十分な速さでスケーリングしていません (そして、技術的な課題と未解決の質問のためにここにはプラットフォームのリスクがあります)、ファイナリティの遅さが問題であり、マキシ アライメント ゲーム (例: Canonical Bridge = Rollup) はせいぜい気を散らすものです (そしてほとんどが優れた製品の構築を妨げます)、すべてのロールアップ (ファセットを除く) は管理者がアップグレードできます...私は続けることができます
実際、私たちが築いてきた基盤は、実際に必要とされているものとほぼ直交していると私は主張します
括弧内は、AWS がビジネスのロングテールから収益の大部分を稼いでおり、適切な基盤を備えた相互運用ネットワーク効果は、ここのベースレイヤーにとって潜在的なゲームチェンジャーです
しかし、やるべきことはまだたくさんあります。しかし、良いニュースは、Celestiaクラウドコンピューティングの論文が方向的に正しいかどうか(つまり、今後3〜12か月)すぐにわかると思います
少し詳しく説明すると、Celestia の成功は、邪魔にならないようにして、他の人が価値を創造し、獲得できるようにする能力に結びついていると思います。それは単に、企業とそのユーザーにより良いオンチェーン製品エクスペリエンスを提供するために存在すべきです(高性能+エンドユーザーの検証可能性 - 必要に応じて)
ここでの売り込みは、ユーザーがどこにいても発行して決済でき、そうしながらコストを節約できるということです。 ナビゲートするアライメントゲームはありません。 最大限にシンプルな基盤の上に 10 倍優れた製品を構築することに集中できます
また、AWS /クラウドコンピューティングの初期の頃、ウォールセントのコンセンサスは、これは非常識な賭けだったということを覚えておくことも重要です。ラリー・エリソンのような接続された人々でさえ、それについて頭を包むことができませんでした



8月13日 21:11
This isn't a 1 off. This is the start of a massive trend of real businesses building their own L1 blockchains. We're in talks with tons of other companies (including some major fortune 500s) who are considering launching their own L1s.
Years ago, enterprise blockchains failed and have been a 3rd rail for a long time. So why now? Why are mature businesses starting to build blockchains again?
And why are they building L1s above anything else?
There are two major reasons enterprise blockchains are coming back:
1/ Stablecoins are maturing: The finance teams we talk to are not afraid or unfamiliar with stablecoins anymore. Thanks to the Circle IPO and coming regulation, they see stablecoins as a powerful and safe technology that can help them cut costs, streamline operations, and earn more on their cash reserves or customer deposits. Most big companies are putting in place infrastructure to hold and move stablecoins. The U.S., Japan, and many other countries are pushing forward stablecoin regulations, and the dust is settling in our favor.
2/ Payments, not provenance: In the previous wave of enterprise blockchain hype most of the use cases were around provenance (aka tracking the origin and lifecycle of some multi-company process, like tracking raw materials across a supply chain or tracking the usage of donor capital). This was always a weird use case that could technically be done with a database. The problem was trust.
Now, the corporations we're talking to are looking at payments as their first use case, almost no matter what industry they're in. Most B2B and B2C payments providers and networks charge merchants and businesses high margins, take days to settle, and have real settlement risk. These problems are much worse as soon as you go cross-border or need to deal with FX. So for multinational corporations (especially marketplaces like Airbnb), in-house blockchain-based payment solutions could lead to billions in savings and better experiences for customers, employees, and gig workers.
And why are they building L1s, not L2s, or contracts?
1/ L1s are battle-tested and familiar to technical decision makers: L1s as a technology platform are well-understood and familiar after 10+ years of development. Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, Sui, Aptos -- every blockchain that people who don't work in the industry know about is an L1 (base maybe being the exception). Cosmos tech alone supports 200+ chains and $70b of assets across almost every vertical, and Hyperliquid, the biggest breakout of the last year, cemented this. (Plus the most successful enterprise blockchains like Canton are L1s).
L2s are exciting but they are still nascent and poorly understood by comparison. (Try explaining the difference between a stage 1 and stage 2 rollup or what a validating bridge is to the CTO of a consumer marketplace business). Decision makers who operate mature businesses usually don't want to take risks on emerging new platforms. They're already taking a big enough risk by getting into crypto, so they need to do it in the way that is most legible to their stakeholders.
2/ Minimizing platform risk: Most of these companies don't want to bet on ETH or SOL or TIA or anything else. They just want to bet on themselves. Building an L1 is the best way to do that. Remember, big companies usually use multiple cloud providers to avoid platform risk from AWS or Microsoft. And you can bet they see Ethereum or Solana as much riskier than those partners.
3/ Control and connectivity: Open, transparent L1s give these companies a great balance of control (so they can own their own platform) and connectivity (so they can plug into and interoperate with the broader crypto-corporate landscape as it evolves). Interop between L2s and other chains like Solana relies on 3rd parties, and often struggles from finality issues due to fraud / Zk proving windows and Ethereum's slow finality. L1s don't have this issue. Settlement happens instantly and deterministically, so interop can function the same way. That is a killer feature when combined with the ability to have your own walled garden where you implement any necessary KYC/AML and application specific logic.
Very excited for the next wave of the internet of blockchains
13.87K
トップ
ランキング
お気に入り