热门话题
#
Bonk 生态迷因币展现强韧势头
#
有消息称 Pump.fun 计划 40 亿估值发币，引发市场猜测
#
Solana 新代币发射平台 Boop.Fun 风头正劲
0xMikolaj
根据@soispoke的建议，我更新了我的分析，以澄清虽然FOCIL纳入名单委员会成员理论上有权修改客户软件在交易纳入方面的规则，但他们面临着显著的实际障碍——包括技术专长要求、持续维护成本，以及保持修改与协议更新兼容的负担——这实际上使他们成为遵循默认客户实现的规则接受者，而不是拥有完全编辑权的代理。
2025年8月29日
New on Good crypto: FOCIL on Ethereum and legally credible neutrality
The debate over whether Ethereum's next major upgrade (Glamsterdam) should include fork‑choice enforced inclusion lists (FOCIL, EIP‑7805) has been framed primarily as an engineering and incentive‑design question. I want to reframe it as a legal‑design question:
What does FOCIL do to the distribution of practical discretion among base‑layer actors, and does that improve the case for what I have elsewhere called "legally credible neutrality"?
My short answer is yes—mostly. FOCIL converts what is today a fragile, norm‑based non-censorship aspiration into a protocol‑enforced constraint for most validators and proposers, which strengthens the argument that they should be treated in law as neutral infrastructure rather than as editors of user activity.
However, at the same time, FOCIL introduces a new locus of discretion in the inclusion‑list committee.
2.87K
Good crypto上的新动态：FOCIL在Ethereum上和合法可信的中立性
关于Ethereum下一个重大升级（Glamsterdam）是否应包括强制执行的分叉选择包含列表（FOCIL，EIP-7805）的辩论，主要被框定为一个工程和激励设计的问题。我想将其重新框定为一个法律设计的问题：
FOCIL对基础层参与者的实际裁量权分配有什么影响，这是否改善了我在其他地方所称的“合法可信的中立性”的案例？
我的简短回答是，是的——大部分情况下。FOCIL将今天脆弱的、基于规范的非审查愿望转变为对大多数验证者和提议者的协议强制约束，这加强了它们在法律上应被视为中立基础设施而非用户活动编辑者的论点。
然而，与此同时，FOCIL引入了一个新的裁量权中心在包含列表委员会中。
3.43K
热门
排行
收藏