"The Possibility of Infinite Patience" Yesterday, I witnessed the most practical application of AI while taking a ride-share. The driver chatted with Doubao the whole time about his rental disputes with his landlord and agent, including issues like wall leaks, missing invoices, and being kicked out of the owner group. He wanted to assert his rights, and Doubao gave him advice: first, make a phone call—if there's no answer, send a written notice—how to write a WeChat notice, how to send an EMS email. I pretended to be asleep while pondering this conversation between a person and AI. The driver's language exhibited clear low cognitive traits (🙏): dominated by complaints and grievances, inconsistent statements, changing details, and wavering goals (wanting to assert rights, fearing trouble, feeling wronged, wanting to settle privately)... They are the ones who need help the most, yet they are also the most "unreceptive to advice". On one hand, they distrust authority (lawyers are expensive, agents are scammers, platforms exploit users), and on the other hand, they fear decision-making, hoping someone will come down from the heavens to make decisions for them. AI might be the most suitable for providing de-authorized knowledge services: no impatience from lawyers, no conflicting interests from agents, and a richer reserve of professional knowledge—a neutral knowledge assistant with infinite patience. However, the "last mile" that AI cannot empower is related to the responsible party—AI has no drive, does not bear consequences, will not force action, and cannot replace action—so it cannot become a benevolent authority. It is possible that AI will ultimately effectively empower those who already like to make decisions for others, those with extensive social connections, or create new roles as information intermediaries. To make a rough classification, if there were only two types of AI products that could survive in the world, one would definitely be the smartest, enhancing efficiency for high-cognition groups, and the other should be the most patient, free from the curse of bias and knowledge, buffering decision-making psychological pressure and sharing emotional burdens for low-cognition groups. If we are to create the latter, my envisioned version of a benevolent AI should be: 1) Only provide 1-2 suggestions; 2) Use elementary school level spoken language; 3) Offer emotional reassurance (but not in the most simplistic "I understand you" way); 4) Be willing to give judgments and suggestions; 5) Know when to be quiet and direct responsibility to real-world individuals.