Subiecte populare
#
Bonk Eco continues to show strength amid $USELESS rally
#
Pump.fun to raise $1B token sale, traders speculating on airdrop
#
Boop.Fun leading the way with a new launchpad on Solana.
Hi, everyone!
I just got back from a temporary ban.
So now I'd like to talk about X's moderation and support functions, how they don't work, and why they're not conducive to this site being a legitimate public forum.
I was banned for allegedly posting "other people's private information without their express authorization and permission."
What did I post, specifically? I posted that the Tea app was hacked. I didn't post any private information whatsoever. I didn't post links to the hack, nor did I post the pictures of anyone on the app. I didn't even retweet any of that content, and there was—and still is—a lot of it posted on this site.
I was very clearly banned under false pretenses.
This is unfortunately normal for X. The way moderation works here is tyrannical; it does not reflect reality, but instead reflects the efforts of people who run sockpuppet accounts, doxxers, journalists, and other ne'er-do-wells with too much time on their hands. If you report a post enough—from real or fake accounts—there will be action brought against the target of the reports, regardless of the content of the posts.
In sharp contrast, X's support staff almost never take down posts that are actually against the rules of this website or even, often enough, against laws the site is beholden to.
The rule against posting another person's private information is probably the best example of this. You are de facto free to dox people on this site, even though doxxing is a bannable offense. I have seen people post personal addresses, phone numbers, private pictures, job titles, employment records, off-the-record remarks, emails, passwords, information about their families, correct and incorrect rumors, and more, and virtually none of it is ever removed after being reported.
Not for want of trying, either. Reports generally receive the response that actual doxxing cases—including whole accounts that advertise themselves as 'the home of the dox of [person]'!—are not violations of the site's rules. At least, until the moment where a post is brigaded and support removes it, seemingly without human review, and they punish the poster, usually with a slap on the wrist.
To get an idea of how perverse this site's moderation is, consider the fact that right now there are tons of very popular posts that actually did provide the link to the data from the Tea hack, and they're still up as of a few minutes ago! Meanwhile, posts that contain no private information like mine have been punished.
To get another idea, consider that there are tons of accounts whose stated purpose is to get other users suspended. They spend their time combing through people's posts to find something to report, and they're often proud enough about this that they post when they've had a success. They openly brag about violating the rules (sockpuppets and brigading are not allowed!) and I've never seen anything happen to them. I've blocked several of these accounts, but some of them are still around as of a few minutes ago.
The site's moderation is tyranny.
The rules of this site effectively do not exist unless you know someone or you're willing to be a lifeless cretin making sockpuppet accounts or riling up groupchats to get things you don't like reported and removed.
If you want to have information about something like the address of your kids' school or the identity of your non-public figure spouse removed, fat chance. But if you want to punish a poster for saying that progressives are wacky? Just spin up ten fake accounts or gather your nuttiest friends and mass report the 'offending' post.
...

141,83K
Limită superioară
Clasament
Favorite