Agentic DeFi is bifurcating → one lane for creating strategies, and another for executing them and the clearest examples of this split are @almanak and @Infinit_Labs they look similar on the surface (AI swarms, automation, speed), but they solve entirely different problems - which is why the community sees them as complementary, not competitive let's look at how they compare in their approach, audience, and PMF 👇 -------------------- @almanak approaches DeFi like an AI-powered quant desk its 18-agent system takes user inputs → LP ranges, RSI triggers, hedging rules - and handles everything from research to coding to simulation to deployment the output? fully verifiable ERC-7540 vaults that behave like reusable yield products this attracts a very specific crowd: builders, quants, treasury managers, and advanced users who actually want to craft and own their strategies ~13K users already treat Almanak as their strategy workshop comparing to @Infinit_Labs , its all about frictionless execution you describe your goal in plain language → “maximise ETH yield with delta-neutral exposure” or “farm points across L2s efficiently” - and its 30+ agents coordinate a multi-step, cross-chain workflow batched into one click in fact, when their prompt-to-DeFi functionality is made available, strategy creating convenience will be taken to the next level this resonates w the other side of the market: retail, beginners, and anyone who wants to do complex things w/o touching DeFi’s complexity w 558K+ wallets connected, and recent integrations w @BinanceWallet and @GateWeb3_HQ , Infinit is clearly building for mass adoption -------------------- zooming out, their roles in the broader agentic DeFi stack become obvious: Almanak = the creation layer it solves the strategy-building gap → turning ideas into structured, auditable, deployable vaults that institutions can trust Infinit = the execution layer it solves the execution gap → turning intent into action across multiple chains and protocols, w/o the user ever needing to open 10 tabs and that’s why there’s no competitive tension they’re solving different pain points for different audiences, on different ends of the same workflow if anything, the market increasingly sees a natural synergy forming between the two: strategies created on Almanak eventually being executed through Infinit’s natural-language interface creation → distribution → execution the building of a full agentic pipeline what other comparisons would you want to see?

Stříbro na pokraji průlomu, zlato slábne Připomínám, že Ostium je jediné místo, kde lze obchodovat s oběma kovy v Onchain!